08 February 2014

Jeffrey Beall sells strange Protection to some Publishers (having Journals with absolute ... Pseudoscience)

Do you still believe that Jeffrey Beall is a reliable person? Do you think that this pseudoblog of Jeffrey Beall has any reliability?  Jeffrey Beall offers strange Protection to some Publishers (having Journals with absolute ... Pseudoscience). This publisher
http://www.atscience.org/ has a clearly pseudoscience journal International Journal of Mevlana Medical Sciences 
it has also some (according Beall's criteria) clearly predatory journals (because they contain unrelated topics - according to the "scientific criteria of Jeffrey Beall")
International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Electronics and Computers but Jeffrey Beall consider that this OA Publisher is OK!  Reliability of Jeffrey Beall is 0 or better negative.


From the blog: impostorbeall.blogspot.com we read the following:

I also thing that Jeffrey Beall is an impostor and academic criminal.

a)   I recently forwarded an email to him from this Publisher: Advanced Technology & Science (ATScience) http://www.atscience.org/
Actually this publisher is spamming me everyday and promise rapid publication of my papers to its conferences and journals. Also, instead of conference proceedings, they push all the papers from the conferences to their journals which is unnaceptable.

I told to Jeffrey Beall:
"The problem is that they promise automatic publication in their journals, if you attend their conference. See this SPAM So, i believe that this: Advanced Technology & Science (ATScience) http://www.atscience.org is a predatory publisher because of their aggressive spam and because of their promises for automatic publication of whatever to receive to their Journals"

I sent real proofs to Jeffrey Beall!
But Jeffrey Beall refused and still refuses to add http://www.atscience.org/ to his black list.
The reply of  Jeffrey Beall was funny and ridiculous.

"I understand. I think this case is borderline. I would like to monitor this  publisher some more before making any decision. Please send me any additional information if possible.
Thank you,
Jeffrey Beall"

Why? If some Publisher sould be in black list the Advanced Technology & Science (ATScience) http://www.atscience.org/ must be from the beggining.

I imagine then that Jeffrey Beall needs some time to make negotiations for his tariff (bribery) from (ATScience) http://www.atscience.org/ . You can find in several blogs the offshore accounts of Jeffrey Beall in Belize and in some islands of Carribean Sea.

If (ATScience) http://www.atscience.org/  pays the necessary money, then Jeffrey Beall will not include it in his List of Predatory Publishers!

b) A Journal with the title: Global Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology and web site http://www.gjset.org/ receives publication fees from the authors. 500 - 1000 USD.
The Journal is quite wide, vast and we would expected to be in the List of Jeffrey Beall.
I sent email to Jeffrey Beall  about it and I astonished with the reply:

"Dr. Clement,

I just looked at the Global Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology. I find the sound annoying, but I don't want to add this journal to my list at this time either. I found some small problems, but not enough to classify it as predatory.

If you think I am mistaken, please let me know.

Thanks,

Jeffrey Beall"

I explained to Jeffrey Beall that according his own criteria, a journal that can publish everything from every science and every scientific field, with a publication fee 500 - 1000 USD must be predatory, because for the same reason, Jeffrey Beall classified as predatory publishers many other honest and legitimate pyblishers.

Jeffrey Beall obviously received his kickback from the Global Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology and did not clasify them as Predatory.

What a Shame Jeffrey Beall! To destroy honest and legitimate publishers and to promote vanity press for revenue in your offshore accounts!

I have all the emails (with headers, IP addresses etc)
Send an email to me: dr.amclement@gmail.com

Appendix I: The Headers of my first email communication with the Impostor Jeffrey Beall

Delivered-To: dr.amclement@gmail.com
Received: by 10.68.152.34 with SMTP id uv2csp58618pbb;
        Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:57:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.50.29.114 with SMTP id j18mr1590372igh.24.1390013876969;
        Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path:
Received: from ironman.ucdenver.edu (ironman.ucdenver.edu. [140.226.189.22])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3si5930515igf.38.2014.01.17.18.57.56
        for
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu designates 140.226.189.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.226.189.22;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu designates 140.226.189.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,677,1384326000"; 
   d="scan'208,217";a="161890550"
Received: from unknown (HELO ex2010hyb3.ucdenver.pvt) ([172.25.0.6])
  by mail-ex-out1.ucdenver.pvt with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2014 19:57:55 -0700
Received: from exhub2.ucdenver.pvt (140.226.231.6) by ex2010hyb3.ucdenver.pvt
 (140.226.231.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 17 Jan
 2014 19:57:55 -0700
Received: from CORTEZ.ucdenver.pvt ([140.226.231.16]) by exhub2.ucdenver.pvt
 ([10.10.10.29]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:57:55 -0700
From: "Beall, Jeffrey"
To: A Clement
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:57:51 -0700
Subject: RE: The problem is that they promise automatic publication in their
 journals, if you attend their conference. See this SPAM
Thread-Topic: The problem is that they promise automatic publication in
 their journals, if you attend their conference. See this SPAM
Thread-Index: Ac8SJbWS/KpK5BosS82LQeu37xL0XwB0zujA
Message-ID: <64db27005e2fd3439e88502d7a5c9121011341a7a4fa ucdenver.pvt="">
References:
In-Reply-To:
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_64DB27005E2FD3439E88502D7A5C9121011341A7A4FACORTEZucden_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu

--_000_64DB27005E2FD3439E88502D7A5C9121011341A7A4FACORTEZucden_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I understand. I think this case is borderline. I would like to monitor this  publisher some more before making any decision. Please send me any additional information if possible.

Thank you,

Jeffrey Beall

From: A Clement [mailto:dr.amclement@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:12 PM
To: Beall, Jeffrey
Subject: The problem is that they promise automatic publication in their journals, if you attend their conference. See this SPAM


Dear Jeff

The problem is that they promise automatic publication in their journals, if you attend their conference. See this SPAM

So, i believe that this: http://www.atscience.org/ is a predatory publisher

SPAM:

Dear Colleagues,

[http://conference.atscience.org/mail/antalya.gif]International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sciences (ICAT'14
>) will be organized in Antalya, Turkey on 12-15 August, 2014. Antalya is a city on the Mediterranean coast of southwestern Turkiye. It is Turkiye's biggest international sea resort, located on the Turkish Riviera.

The main objective of ICAT is to present the latest research and results of scientists related to Computer Sciences, Electrical & Electronics,  Manufacturing Technologies, Energy Technologies and Mechatronics. This conferences provides opportunities for the different areas delegates to exchange new ideas and application experiences face to face, to establish business or research relations and to find global partners for future collaboration.

Manuscripts
The organizing committee of conference is pleased to invite prospective authors to submit their original manuscripts to ICAT'14. All full paper submissions will be double blind and peer reviewed and evaluated based on originality, technical and/or research content/depth, correctness, relevance to conference, contributions, and readability.


Accepted papers

All the accepted papers presented in the conference that match with the topics of the journals will be published in the following journals:
* International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering (IJISAE)
* International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Electronics and Computers (IJAMEC)
* International Journal of Energy Applications and technology (IJEAT)//www.atscience.org/IJEAT>
* International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER)er.org/index.php/ijrer>
* International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies (IJAET)<http://academicpaper.org/index.php/IJAET>

Deadline

Paper Submission : 31 March 2014

Venue

The ICAT'14 will be held at Harrington Park Resort Antalya that is located on the most of beautiful and Antalya's popular Konyaalti Beach with Blue Flag.The hotel is on the seafront and will welcome you with its unique Beydag lari Mountain view and Mediterranean 's blue color. The hote offers perfect  accommodation with all-inclusive-food and beverage service.

Post Conference Tours
We will have touristical tours (cultural, natural, sportive or historical) everyday during the Conference after the sessions. For more information see our website: http://conference.atscience.org/

We hope this conference will be of your interest.

Best regards,
ICAT'14 Organizing Committee


Answer from  Jeffrey Beall
>
>
>
> I don't think this is a predatory publisher. I don't see any major problems.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jeffrey Beall
>
>
>
> From: A Clement [mailto:dr.amclement@gmail.com
com>]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:33 AM
> To: Beall, Jeffrey
> Subject: What is your opinion for this predatory publisher
>
>
>
> Dear Jeff
>
>  What is your opinion for this predatory publisher
>
> http://www.atscience.org/
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> A M Clement


Appendix II: The Headers of my second email communication with the Impostor Jeffrey Beall

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Delivered-To: dr.amclement@gmail.com
Received: by 10.68.152.34 with SMTP id uv2csp292564pbb;
        Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:00:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.238.144 with SMTP id ks16mr3024050icb.53.1389801603909;
        Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path:
Received: from fe-26.ucdenver.edu (fe-26.ucdenver.edu. [140.226.189.62])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r6si6806651icy.0.2014.01.15.08.00.02
        for
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu designates 140.226.189.62 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.226.189.62;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu designates 140.226.189.62 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,663,1384326000"; 
   d="scan'208,217";a="161300587"
Received: from unknown (HELO ex2010hyb2.ucdenver.pvt) ([172.25.0.6])
  by mail-ex-out2.ucdenver.pvt with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2014 09:00:01 -0700
Received: from exhub2.ucdenver.pvt (140.226.231.6) by ex2010hyb2.ucdenver.pvt
 (140.226.231.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 15 Jan
 2014 09:00:00 -0700
Received: from CORTEZ.ucdenver.pvt ([140.226.231.16]) by exhub2.ucdenver.pvt
 ([10.10.10.29]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:00:00 -0700
From: "Beall, Jeffrey"
To: A Clement
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:59:56 -0700
Subject: RE: What is your opinion for this predatory publisher
Thread-Topic: What is your opinion for this predatory publisher
Thread-Index: Ac8ONP0GyWsMLUrsSLWsWnmlCei+QgD1a/Zw
Message-ID: <64db27005e2fd3439e88502d7a5c91210113418989a9 ucdenver.pvt="">
References:




In-Reply-To:
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_64DB27005E2FD3439E88502D7A5C91210113418989A9CORTEZucden_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu

--_000_64DB27005E2FD3439E88502D7A5C91210113418989A9CORTEZucden_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dr. Clement,

I just looked at the Global Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology . I find the sound annoying, but I don't want to add this journal to my list at this time either. I found some small problems, but not enough to classify it as predatory.

If you think I am mistaken, please let me know.

Thanks,

Jeffrey Beall



From: A Clement [mailto:dr.amclement@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Beall, Jeffrey
Subject: Re: What is your opinion for this predatory publisher

Have you seen this
http://www.gjset.org/  Jeff?



Appendix III: Petre Dini did not pay the "tax of shame" to Jeffrey Beall! I googled Crook + Jeffrey Beall and I found these not very good things for Jeffrey Beall
 From: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/I-am-also-victim-of-Jeffrey-Beall-td4027931.html

My name is Petre Dini and I am the President of IARIA, www.iaria.org
I am also victim of Jeffrey Beall 
Actually, this pseudo-scholar Jeffrey Beall is a thug. He uses black lists to create profit. Also he is involved in tax evation and money laundry.
I asked him several times to remove IARIA from his black list and he promised me to re-analyze the site www.iaria.org
There is not any real reason to have our institute IARIA in his pseudo-list.
The cost to re-analyze the portal of my organization www.iaria.org was 100,000 USD,
Exactly "re-analyze" was the verb that he used in our phone conversation. Why re-analyze? Who is he that analyzes or re-analyzes Academic organizations?
What are his qualifications. I am professor in Electrical Engineering with many publications (in IARIA and outside IARIA). Who is this pseudo-professor - money hungry thug?

Anyway, Jeffrey Beall gave us two accounts in Tax Heaven Countries: One account in a Bank of St. Vincent and another account in Belize.
We do not pay 100,000 USD for IARIA and so IARIA is still now in his list.

I estimate that Hindawi has paid to pseudo-professor Jeffrey Beall something like 1500000 (1 million and half) $

Somebody must report Jeffrey Beall' activities in American Authorities.

Anybody can kill him. 

If somebody kills him, he will absolve the Humanity from this monster.

Thanks

Petre Dini
From: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:E6n5vObawocJ:bogus-conferences.blogspot.com/2012/12/have-you-hear-about-jeffrey-bealls-big.html+&cd=2&hl=it&ct=clnk
Assoc Prof Chen Chun-Hsien posted a comment in our blog:

I also agree that Jeffrey Beall is a crook. He asked from Cambridge Scholar Publisher the amount of 10000 dollars. Cambridge Scholar Publisher paid to Jeffrey Beall 10000 dollars and the saved their name from Beall's list. My name is Chun-Hsien Chen, I am Assoc.Professor in the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. IAENG fake conferences' organizers have just added my name in their committee of the apparently fake "IAENG 2013 ICAIA Conference" ...without my knowledge. I conclude that IAENG conferences are quite junk, fake, bogus and ... trush. I strongly recommend my students as well as any scholar not to publish with IAENG. Assoc.Prof.Chun-Hsien Chen Email: MCHCHEN@ntu.edu.sg Phone:  (+65)6790 4888 Office: N3.2-01-06

So, what is the reliability of Jeffrey Beall? Is there any reliability in the Jeffrey Beall' s list?



Spam from the Predatory, Fake, Bogus, Aggressive, Mock, Scam, Felonious: WORLD SCIENTIFIC and IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS
New Spam from the Predatory, Fake, Bogus, Aggressive, Mock, Scam, Felonious: WORLD SCIENTIFIC and IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS.

a) These are commercial companies with one target ONLY: the Profit 


b) No real peer review. They publish conference proceedings of the worst kind 


c)They have published more than 250 SCIgen Fake papers (ie garbage papers from SCIgen MIT Students' machine 


d) Many of their journals are without Editor-in-Chief (exactly as the bogus Hindawi Company)


e) They charge 1750-2500 EUR per paper for their open access Journals. This is a Crime!






New Spam from the Predatory, Fake, Bogus, Aggressive, Mock, Scam, Felonious: WORLD SCIENTIFIC and IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS
Series on Quality, Reliability and Engineering Statistics: Volume 12
Encyclopedia and Handbook of Process Capability Indices
A Comprehensive Exposition of Quality Control Measures

by W. L. Pearn (National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan) & Samuel Kotz (George Washington University, USA)hardcover:
US$166 / £110 / S$220
US$124.50 / £82.50 / S$165
ebook:
US$125 / £83 / S$165
US$93.75 / £62.25 / S$123.75

till 10 April 2014
Discount code:

WSGOLD25
This unique volume provides an up-to-date and detailed description of the various process capability indices widely (and sometimes misleadingly) used in the applications at production sites. The authors, who are internationally recognized experts in this area with numerous contributions to the field, provide a lucid exposition, which covers all the main aspects, developments and advances. » more
People who read this title were also interested in:

Construction Technology for Tall Buildings

4th Edition

Introduction to Computational Earthquake Engineering

2nd Edition

Basics of Reliability and Risk Analysis

Worked Out Problems and Solutions

Materials Degradation and Its Control by Surface Engineering

3rd Edition
 
  
      How to Order
  • An ordering guide can be found here.
  • Prices are subject to change without prior notice.
  • This promotion is available only to individuals purchasing directly from World Scientific's web site. It is not available to libraries and booksellers.
  • Not available in India and SAARC countries
  • Promotion is valid while stocks last. Delivery may be delayed up to 2 months due to high demand.
  • S$ price is valid for Singapore and China markets only.
To unsubscribe, please click the link found at the bottom of the email, alternatively, please notify us at unsub@wspc.com

Copyright © 2014 World Scientific Publishing Co. All rights reserved.



Googling "Fake Conferences" we found 2 interesting blogs about an academic scamp.

iaria-highsci.blogspot.com
The title of this blog is: Jeffrey Beall: A Predatory (money hungry) Librarian

The other blog is
jeffreybeall.blogspot.com
The title of this blog is: Jeffrey Beall: a crook is among us. Jeffrey Beall: a tacky felon is among us.

I recently made an inquiry to Jeffrey Beall (the Denver, USA librarian who runs a webpage where he slanders and insults about 500 publishing houses), whether he, Jeffrey Beall himself, has the ability to solve the simple math equation 5x+3 = 0.


Jeffrey Beall replied to my first email, that he has never studied even the simplest form of Math. Meaning that he doesn’t know what “equation” means (he has never even seen equations like 5x+3 = 0, 3x*x + 7x -4 =0 etc), neither does he know what “Derivative” or “Integral” mean.

Jeffrey Beall told me that he has a Bachelor in Spanish and English language. This of course didn’t stop him blacklisting hundreds of houses that publish Math, Physics, Computer Science, Engineering, Economics, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Space Science etc Journals. That from a man who isn’t even able to solve the simple equation 5x+3 = 0, and who doesn’t know what Derivative or Integral mean.

Recently, Jeffrey Beall included in his “black list” an old, big Academic Publishing House, with several, historic Journals in Math, Physics, Computer Science, Engineering, Economics (some of which have been indexed in ISI and SCOPUS), and that because, according to Jeffrey Beal, they had copied the… Maxwell Equations from a 2007 article.

Obviously, since Jeffrey Beall doesn’t know how to solve the equation 5x+3 = 0, and since he doesn’t know what Derivative and Integral mean, he has zero knowledge when it comes to Electricity or Physics and has never seen the Maxwell Equations (not even in their most basic form).

As expected from somebody who is entirely clueless regarding even elementary Math and Physics, he considered the Maxwell Equations found in the Journal to be plagiarized… from a 2007 paper.

With a Bachelor in Spanish and English in his CV, Jeffrey Beall passes judgment even to Medicine, Biology, Chemistry etc Journals and articles, while he is fully aware that he’s never attended a University course on which nucleotides make up the DNA molecule, he’s never heard what enzyme, catalysis, proteins etc are, and if one asks him what pH is, he’ll be completely ignorant.

However, in his bizarre blog, this person has declared himself a critic of everyone and everything. He blacklists publishing houses (many of which having journals and conferences indexed in ISI, SCOPUS, Compendex, ACM etc), he includes stand-alone journals in “black lists”, slanders Editors-in-Chief, Authors etc. Of course he does all that selectively, following a certain logic of his, which will be analyzed below.
In a later email that I sent him, I asked him to comment on why he includes a small publishing house in his black list because “they copied Maxwell’s Equations from a 2007 paper” (poor Jeffrey Beall doesn’t know that Maxwell’s Equations are taught in Universities’ first year elementary physics), while at the same time he excludes IEEE, who have over 85 SCIgen machine-generated fake conference papers published and indexed.

(See: A 2013 scientometrics paper demonstrated that at least 85 SCIgen machine-generated papers have been published by IEEE. The Paper has been published in Springer Verlag:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-012-0781-y
Download the full paper from:
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf)
He also didn’t respond to the question why he didn’t include Elsevier in his black list, who were revealed to have been publishing 6 Medical Journals between 2000 and 2005 with fake articles and studies, that were funded by pharmaceutical companies, in order to scientifically prove that their products were superior to their competitors’. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier
or
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/05/elsevier-confirms-6-fake-journals-more.html

In a third email I asked him where his moral and academic responsibility stands, since if due to him including some publishing houses in black lists, those houses reduce or cease their activity (due to his immoral slandering), hundreds of jobs will be lost and families will end up in the street. Naturally, despite my repeated emails, Jeffrey Beall never replied.

There are also rumors on the internet that some publishing houses, like Hindawi and Elsevier, pay Jeffrey Beall on a yearly basis in order not to be included in his black list. This looks like heavy taxing that the publisher is asked to pay annually to Jeffrey Beall, and, as we’ll see below, part of this tax ends up in the Denver University funds.

Actually, Hindawi was in Jeffrey Beall’s black list a year ago. Then, after negotiations, Jeffrey Beall placed them in a watching list (i.e. an “under observation” list), and eventually completely removed them.

Just like Jeffrey Beall himself mentioned in his blog, Hindawi’s people visited him in Denver and offered him “explanations”. After that, Jeffrey Beall gradually removed Hindawi from his black list.
Why, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, did you agree to meet with Hindawi’s representatives in your office in Denver, when Hindawi was black listed? What did you talk about, Mr. Jeffrey Beall? Hindawi, as mentioned on their website, has an annual turnover of $6 million.

Couldn’t they use part of that money to pay off Jeffrey Beall?

Furthermore, in his blog, Jeffrey Beall has posted a photo of Hindawi’s headquarters, which he calls “House of Spam”. So, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, why isn’t Hindawi in your black list, when among your fundamental black listing reasons, like you mention in your blog, is spam?

Having read all that, you can draw your own conclusions on who Jeffrey Beall is and what his real motives behind his publishing house and scientific organization black listing blog are. Houses and Organizations that Jeffrey Beall calls “Predatory Publishers”.

Maybe it’s time to talk about Predatory Librarians, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. About librarians who target Open Access Journals, especially because the open, online PDF policy deprives librarians (like Jeffrey Beall) from the possibility of receiving kickbacks from publishing houses.

To those who are not aware, it is known that several publishing houses paid- and pay-off librarians (like Jeffrey Beall), in order to get their libraries to subscribe to those houses.

Meaning that, in order for a certain University, Research Center, Company to buy some books or subscribe to some journals, it is common knowledge that librarians receive money under the table from the respective publishing houses. It is therefore natural and understandable for this kind of librarians (Jeffrey Beall, for instance) to fight Open Access Journals and Open Access Publishing Houses, since they 
a) lose their kickbacks, 
b) lose their power and influence in the library, as well as the University.

I’ve saved all my email exchange with Jeffrey Beall, along with their headers/source code, and I will soon upload them to various websites. I need everyone’s help though, by sending me emails (to the email address found at the bottom) and exchanging information on Jeffrey Beall’s scandalous behavior.

And one last question to Jeffrey Beall: How can a librarian WITHOUT a Ph.D. be an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver, Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

Could it be that Jeffrey Beall bribed older professors, using the abundance of money that he is said to possess? 

Could it be that Jeffrey Beall threatened that if they don’t vote for him, he’ll include all journals where they have papers published in his black list, and slander them on the internet?

Or is it that they were so much impressed by his research? Actually, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, what is your scientific research? Your scientific research as a “real scientist” that is, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. What publications do you have, besides slandering, insulting and discredit hundreds of scientific organizations and publishing houses? What do you teach at the University of Denver Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

Is there really any course (real scientific course) that you can teach, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, besides calling publishing houses and scientific organizations “predatory”?

 It doesn’t look like it, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. No matter how hard we looked, we didn’t find any courses taught by you at the University of Denver. 

Neither on your personal webpage, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, nor on your money-making blog, nor even on the University of Denver website is there any mention about courses taught by you.

So, since you do absolutely no scientific research, and you don’t even teach pre-graduate or post-graduate students, what is your role at the University of Denver, Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

Does the University of Denver pay you a salary, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, or do you pay the University to let you bear the title of Assistant Professor? 

A title that you really do not deserve, as you have no Ph.D., no actual research work and do no teaching whatsoever. It is a shame for the University of Denver to have professors like you, Jeffrey Beall.

Or is running a blog that slanders everyone and everything considered scientific research? 

It most certainly is not, Mr. Jeffrey Beall.

Could it be, however, an applied money-making project for you and your university, Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

 (By the way, why should a small publishing house from some place in India, which cannot attract papers, nor editorial board members, from western universities, be in your black list Mr. Jeffrey Beall? In this case, you should also black list all non-US and non-European universities. Of course there exist first-rate universities, like Harvard, MIT, Berkeley, Cambridge. Should all other universities be in a black list? Is this your logic “Professor” Beall? Furthermore, you condemn any new publishing house, as it is natural for them to not have papers and not be indexed as soon as they launch, but has to deal with you, who, like a vulture, immediately includes them in your black list for those reasons.)

I would greatly appreciate your response, Mr. Jeffrey Beal. And I would also appreciate feedback from anyone who agrees with me. 

My aim is to create a network of true scientists and expose “Professor”, “Academic Teacher” and, above all, “Researcher” Jeffrey Beall (this science jack-of-all-trades, who doesn’t know a first-degree algebraic equation, derivatives, integrals, elementary Physics and Chemistry laws, etc)
Thank you


We found also this information in the Blog: netdriver.blogspot.com

Shame for IEEE, Springer Verlag, ACM, AIP, WorldScientific, Taylor and Francis, Elsevier

For more than 8 years our blog has identified that IEEE, Springer Verlag, ACM, AIP (American Institute of Physics), WorldScientific (Singapore), Taylor and Francis, Elsevier conferences are fake, bogus, scam, sham, mock and predatory. Now we have additional Proofs:

Visit: http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763

http://retractionwatch.com/2014/02/24/springer-ieee-withdrawing-more-than-120-nonsense-papers/

or google: IEEE 120 SCIgen Papers
The IEEE SCIgen Papers were 85 two years ago:
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf
Several Blogs (included netdriver.blogpost.com) reported this. In 2014, these SCIgen papers in IEEE were 120.
Let''s start with the IEEE SCIGen Fake Papers of 2009. What's happened in 2009:In 2009, we had received the following email from a girl that was working in IARIA's secretariat.

IEEE Computer Society Press sent it in January 17 (2009) to all the IEEE Sponsored, Co-Sponsored Conferences as well as to conferences
that publish their Proceedings with IEEE CS Press. It is impressive how many IEEE conferences are based on a review on the Abstract!.

From: EButterfield@computer.org
to: EButterfield@computer.org
cc: ABurgess@computer.org,
John Walz: , Reisman, Sorel" , AStickley@computer.org, TBaldwin@computer.org, r.sterritt@ulster.ac.uk
date Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:03 AMsubject Confidential: Important CPS Message Regarding Fraudulent Machine-Generated Paper Submissions

TO: CPS Clients FROM: Evan Butterfield, Director of Products and Services RE: Fraudulent Machine-Generated Paper Submissions (CONFIDENTIAL) DATE: 16 January 2009
The IEEE Computer Society (CS) has evidence that multiple (IEEE) conferences are receiving machine-generated papers. In two cases, conferences have actually accepted an obviously fraudulent submission. This is a serious issue that threatens the credibility of your conference, the quality of the digital library, and the reputation of both the IEEE and CS. It requires your immediate attention. Please take this opportunity to ensure that your peer review processes are being followed, and adapt to any new requirements that may be communicated by the IEEE or the Computer Society. No conference published by CPS should rely on an abstract review. It is very important that you review carefully the full text of all papers submitted to your conference. If you have already accepted papers, your program committee should review the full text again. While CPS staff will be conducting random spot-checks of conference papers in the publishing queue, we are relying on you to authenticate the content of your proceedings. Any papers that were not actually presented at your conference need to be brought to our attention, and should receive close review. In known cases, the machine-generated origin is obvious from a reading of the first few paragraphs of the paper; the abstracts are human-generated and do not indicate the quality of the paper itself. In the past, papers have been submitted by “Herbert Schlangemann,” but be mindful that the perpetrator of this fraud will change the approach over time. In the event you discover any evidence of questionable content or behavior, please communicate that to us immediately along with an action plan for addressing the problem. Thank you for your help in maintaining the quality of our products.

END OF 2009 IEEE EMAIL